Yeah you fucking heard me, wikipedia point blank sucks, sure it has a lot of information, but overall having a lot doesn’t mean it’s good or that it’s relevant, for the usual information wikipedia is like all other encyclopedias, but what did set those fuckers at wikipedia apart is gone, I’m not saying this because most of my (more than reasonable) fixes and new pages were mostly all deleted, because they don’t adhere to certain pre-requisites that they’ve imagined, mostly idiotic.
Ok, I’ll be more specific, unlike other encyclopedias the idea behind wikipedia is that anyone can add their knowledge to the site, therefore not creating a encyclopedia like britannica that is created by a selected panel of experts in their fields, but a place were knowledge can be more ample, that can focus on obscure subjects, that can give a more broad view of all the possible subjects, but No… those preposterously sybaritic imbeciles at wikipedia run that shit with just a few people that share the same values and mentality, creating or otherwise monitoring the content made by others, so wikipedia is just like britannica but with added overhead and with lack of expert paid knowledge (that although not superior per se, are at least a safer bet), so wikipedia sucks as an encyclopedia, as a social community/experiment is not that bad, wait… what am i saying? Everyone that uses wikipedia are a bunch of squirrel molesters, i have nothing but contempt for everyone of you, i quit, and everyone else should quit as well.