The “traditional” encyclopedia is a bunch of paid experts that give their insight into subjects that they are, well, experts of, so its a form of elitist knowledge, i have no problem with that, you get what you pay for… but wikipedia was different, at first its was a truly free for all like jimmy said of a sort of sum of all human knowledge… i’ll repeat ALL HUMAN KNOWLEDGE, but what we have now with wikipedia is the sum of knowledge of a very restrict group of people, really! try and open a new article or add something to any article and check it out, its fucking idiotic, no new user can really add anything of relevance to wikipedia… its like a reversed britannica, but at least with britannica i have some assurance of quality and expertise and not a bunch of anonymous users that just cause they can point some article on the web to prove their point then apparently it is the truth or that after they did some months of grunt work or troll that they now are apparently experts on shit, and yes… wikipedia loves shit, ohh you wont find cover bands or new up and coming music acts or obscure tribes in amazon, but sure as hell you can know the entire storyline of a single pokemon character and crossover characters and that ohhh so sad obscure never before shown episode were psyduck is gutted by pikachu, yeah i want some of that sweet wikipedia knowledge… yum yum

And what about the wikipedia foundation… laundering money are we? if not, at least its the same group of idiotic morons that want to get paid, the last time i checked you don’t need a foundation and a board of directors to keep the site online you don’t need all this bureaucracy to make something shine, the people that contribute also help run… what’s the fuck with that, its simple, they need the catchy name and foundation(tm) so they can skip on taxes to get more respectability to get more donations and to get themselves some money’s… or something like that, its fucking shady as hell and even if wikipedia foundation was a wonderful foundation, wikipedia would still fuck balls, my recommendation… make donations with your credit card and then make charge backs stating that you donated with the understanding that all human knowledge was on wikipedia and they made you donate under false pretenses….. fuckers

So here is his sketch of what the code of conduct should be (and i’ll comment every single one):

1) Take responsibility not just for your own words, but for the comments you allow on your blog.

Fuck you, i take no responsibility, i say what’s on my freaking mind, sometimes it’s right sometimes it’s wrong, at least i tend to explain my reasons in a logical way, if i’m wrong i’ll say so, but auto-censorship or having to take divine responsibility for every single shitty thing one does, fuck you and fuck your redneck morals, the same goes for everyone that comments here.

2) Label your tolerance level for abusive comments..

Ok, for fiendish.org there is no limit to the abuse, especially if it’s got some point (telling niggers that they are niggers although funny, has no point…)

3) Consider eliminating anonymous comments.

What? So were else in the world could we talk freely without the fear of persecution? Stupid Fuck

4) Ignore the trolls.

Well, then what audience would i have?

5) Take the conversation offline, and talk directly, or find an intermediary who can do so.

What am i? Their counselor? Their private tutor, anything they want to say private they can say it in public, you don’t like it?, then shut the fuck up.

6) If you know someone who is behaving badly, tell them so.

I always do, but not in the condescending way you are implying …

7) Don’t say anything online that you wouldn’t say in person.

You mean online we have to abide to the same moral compass and community rules that we have offline? Why? You want the offline world to be identical to the online one? You really want to fuck things up, if we can’t do it here, to have an online life with as little inhibitions as possible, then i guess we would all have to get ourselves drunk, you are just a fucked up close minded person that needs to inflate his ego by using your personality status to impose your moral high grounds to everybody else, i guess the same way i have the necessity to fucking do this shitty post about fucking you… so go fuck some squirrels

Ok, I’ll be more specific, unlike other enciclopedias the idea behind wikipedia is that anyone can add their knowledge to the site, therefore not creating a enciclopedia like britanica that is created by a selected panel of experts in their fields, but a place were knowledge can be more ample, that can focus on obscure subjects, that can give a more broad view of all the possible subjects, but No… those preposterously sybaritic imbeciles at wikipedia run that shit with just a few people that share the same values and mentality and create or otherwise monitor the content made by others, so wikipedia is just like Britannica but with added overhead and with lack of expert paid knowledge (that although not superior per se, are at least a safer bet), so wikipedia sucks as an enciclopedia, as a social community/experiment is not that bad, wait… what am i saying? Everyone that uses wikipedia are a bunch of squirrel molesters, i have nothing but contempt for everyone of you, i quit, and everyone else should quit as well.

1) Focus on crowds of fucking morons, try like religious, hippie tree “we are all going to die” hugers, republicans, basically anyone that loves something but doesn’t know anything about it.

2) Bring friends, you need a mob to incite the riot, we don’t want them all to turn on little young you, so a couple of friends spread out will do the trick, they’ll just have to shout “fuckin A” when you start talking.

3) Wait for the best moment, and then interrupt whoever is speaking, and don’t let him speak again, you don’t have to make sense to interrupt someone, just say exactly the opposite that he is saying, include words like “because God said so” or “there are way more studies that prove otherwise” or “Prove that right now, where’s the proof?”.

4) Start making outlandish claims, don’t be ashamed to lie, and lie with indignation, things like “i can believe they let a pedophile talk for us all” or “i saw him beat his wife” or “i was in college with him and saw him beat a dog” or “i fucked him in the ass and then he stalked me for months”.

5) Then if your a guy punch a girl of another ethnic group in the face or if your a girl punch a girl form another ethnic group on the ear.

and that’s about it, good luck and happy rioting ^^

I don’t, but if your going to do something, do it right, you dumb fucks, people like Bono are half well intended, half self promotion, sure he did some other “interesting stuff”, but almost all (if not all) of this “humanitarian initiatives” are a travesty, sure people die, they die for a lot of reasons, and last i checked … everywhere, in every country, no matter how rich, so what makes people starving or with aids in Africa a bigger problem, then let’s say all the crack addicts, the homeless, the poor in more developed countries?

Ohhh it’s fucking much more people, ohhh please, they fuck like rabbits, what those niggers, yellow people, or any people under the rainbow (yes because white is not a colour of the rainbow) need to do is, first if all …. stop fucking, then start studying and then stop fucking some more, say it with me JUST SAY NOOOO, if they don’t fuck they won’t spread so much disease since there won’t be so many hosts, and since there are less people, aid will be more effective (but i guess we won’t have so many photos of starving niggers babies), and if they start to learn they can develop the same fucking things the developed countries can, like ipods and mchickens, hell they already have all the natural resources they could possibly want, it’s just in the interest of all the developed country’s that places like Africa just … stay just like they are…so “Bono” you can go stuff it were the red don’t shine.

Now, this latest campaign troubles me in a “i wish i know the coca colas ceo’s address so i can wait for him and beat the fuck out of him”, it is clear to me that they were making a blatant relation between drinking coca cola and living a long life (drink cola>makes you happy>if you are happy>you live a long life) and that shit is not only based on a faulty premise (happiness is not something that can be measured, you are happy sometimes, you are not happy sometimes, you are indifferent sometimes, how can you say that if you are 100% all the time happy that you will live longer?, that’s just absurd…I’m confused…), so i guess its a pure fucking lie, it makes me sick (and jealous), so I’m done with coca cola products, fuck them, fuck their endorsements, fuck their marketing machine and i assure everyone that if you go my way and don’t touch the ville thing, you will have a much bigger probability of living longer…

A lot of questions and little room for manoeuvre, if i bring materialism into the question, i can deduct that if it exists it has to be something, therefore i should be able to touch, smell, but as i recollect there wasn’t any particular smell, so maybe materialism wouldn’t suffice, maybe it’s something purely in my head, a form of idealism, if that would be so, how can i lose it ?, even if i lost my memory it would be of no consequence because its existence in the first place would be ephemeral, it’s just an interpretation of my mind, fusing my knowledge with my imagination on a cacophony of purely mental interpretations of what is real, this is all fine and dandy but it doesn’t solve my hypothetical problem, how can i return that feeling ?

By recurring to the actual experience of the event and live it again ?, in a sort of attempt to conceive some form of unsatisfactory replication of reality gone by or should i just try and recollect my memories of the subject and just try and construct it mentally, both seem insufficient and therefore prompt to failure, so all in all, i think i will sit down.